Compromising on certain decisions creates short-term “wins”. Wins in the sense that everyone is happy. Unforunately, in the long-run, short-term happiness is rarely a celebrated metric*. That’s why I found myself liking J Allard after reading this article in Business Week.
Compromising would have been an easier route here:
“…Allard insisted that the new Xbox video game console be developed without using Windows. In one meeting, Gates berated him for suggesting that the operating system wasn’t up to snuff. But Allard argued that it wasn’t specialized enough to handle video gaming. Gates eventually relented, in a decision that is widely seen today as a key to the console’s success.”
Gates was a bit miffed at the decision in the short-term, but is surely enjoying the long-run results from the X-Box.
“Never afraid to speak his mind, Allard started pushing buttons way back in 1994, when, as an eager 25-year-old programmer only three years on Microsoft’s payroll, he penned a sea-changing memo titled “Windows: The Next Killer Application on the Internet,” which found its way to Gates. The note, now part of Microsoft lore, helped awaken Gates to the potential and threat of the Web. “I’m a pain-in-the-ass change agent,” Allard says.”
How can I not like someone like this: “I love that gravity is unforgiving,” he says. He even blazes through e-mail, jotting down notes all in lower case: “shift key slows you down,” he writes.
[* for some reason the following exchange entered my imagination “Tom, revenue is down 30 % this fiscal year due to decision Z”. Tom: “Yes, but everyone sure was smiling after that meeting!”]
