The tale of Riya, an internet start-up, is a good one. Munjal Shah, the CEO and founder, has done a great job documenting the iterative approach they’ve taken to developing Riya’s business plan (see parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5).

This was great to see. Too many start-ups approach technology/product development as iterative processes; yet, when it comes to their business plan they write a single one in stone.

Peter Rip, a partner in Leapfrog Ventures (investors in Riya), discusses the change in business startegy in a post titled “The Riya Pivot”:

Riya “launched with one thesis, but went back to the drawing board to re-invent the business a mere six weeks after the launch.”

Peter describes eighteen areas that are much clearer now than 18 months ago. The list is, in essence, the major points of a business plan. Now, this isn’t bad - no early-stage company will have a well defined answer for the points.

What Peter is describing is Riya working through the second stage for start-ups - commercialization: providing proof.

Riya’s team has gone out and found validated assumptions that were different than their initial hypothesis. As Peter puts it, Riya’s “business model is crystal clear.”

Here’s where I feel for Riya. While I’m impressed that they eventually worked through the commercialization phase, they didn’t respect the value the phase adds to start-ups until they realized that their initial strategy was wrong. Riya did not plan for the commercialization phase.

Instead, they did the very traditional thing: wrote a business plan and raised a tonne of money against it without providing the proof and validation that the commercialization phase brings.

Riya raised $19 Million when the cost of raising funding was most expensive - without any validated assumptions the uncertainty, and therefore risk, was high and they exchanged cheap equity for expensive funding.

Compare that to today’s situation - they have validated assumptions, altered their business plan accordingly and mitigated substantial risk. Now the cost of funding is significantly cheaper.

If Riya had planned for the commercialization phase, raising only enough funds to go out and test/validate assumptions, they would have been exactly where they are today - ready to scale - except they would be exchanging expensive equity for cheap funding.


COMMENTS / 6 COMMENTS

[…] And that reminded me to revisit a previous post at Disruptive Thoughts, What Riya Did Wrong, and follow-up on the comments left by Riya’s CEO, Munjal Shah. […]

What Riya Did Wrong Cont’d at Disruptive Thoughts added these pithy words on Dec 21 06 at 12:01 pm

[…] don’t mean to dwell. Really. But c’mon […]

What Riya Did Wrong Cont’d II at Disruptive Thoughts added these pithy words on Mar 21 07 at 10:33 pm

Fraser, You are so right. Often people iterate in the same market / value proposition instead of realizing most lack of uptake (usage) is due to the macro space not whether you built this little feature or not. We are getting ready to release our next product. If you or any others want to join our private alpha (we are really looking for input) please email me here blog3 at munjal.com Thanks Munjal Shah - Riya

Munjal Shah added these pithy words on Oct 04 06 at 4:01 pm

One more thing - you are actually right we could have done more business model validation on Riya 1.0. The reality though on the fund raising is something different. You couldn’t even dream of building or even pitching a next gen image search engine without significant resources… so it is kind of a circle, the money led to the opportunity to go after big markets and have a chance to succeed.

Munjal Shah added these pithy words on Oct 04 06 at 4:06 pm

Fraser,

You are so right. Often people iterate in the same market / value proposition instead of realizing most lack of uptake (usage) is due to the macro space not whether you built this little feature or not.

We are getting ready to release our next product. If you or any others want to join our private alpha (we are really looking for input) please email me here blog3 at munjal.com

Thanks
Munjal Shah - Riya

Munjal Shah added these pithy words on Oct 04 06 at 8:01 pm

One more thing - you are actually right we could have done more business model validation on Riya 1.0. The reality though on the fund raising is something different. You couldn’t even dream of building or even pitching a next gen image search engine without significant resources… so it is kind of a circle, the money led to the opportunity to go after big markets and have a chance to succeed.

Munjal Shah added these pithy words on Oct 04 06 at 8:06 pm

SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Return to Top

What Riya Did Wrong (or, Why Companies Should Respect The Commercialization Phase; or, How To Make Expensive Funding Cheap)

Welcome to the conversation.

Hi, I'm Fraser and this is my personal site where I write about the things I'm interested in: start-up strategy, the web, music, and life.

My days are spent commercializing emerging technologies. Currently I'm helping to deliver the promise of semantic web to the consumer market at AdaptiveBlue. Previously I was at Trivaris, a Canadian seed stage investment firm.

I am a co-founder of Innovation Night, a community driven event supporting entrepreneurship in Canadian and US cities.

Here's what I'm doing right now:

    These are the people in my neighborhood: